October 31, 2026

It All Started With the Smell of Gasoline

It All Started With the Smell of Gasoline

It was August 2017, and I was sitting in a rented Tesla at a Supercharger in Sedona, Arizona, when I smelled gasoline.

It was 95 degrees outside, and we’d been sitting there forever. I didn’t yet understand that charging a battery from 80% to 100% could take so long, especially in extreme heat. The Tesla was struggling to keep its batteries cool.

At the time, I owned a 2014 Kia Soul, and I’d been reading disturbing reports about Kias catching fire across the United States. For a split second, that familiar concern came rushing back.

Then I remembered I wasn’t in my Kia.

The smell was coming from the gas station next door, where a tanker truck was filling the underground tanks. I had to laugh at myself. Although, given the heat, I was also a little worried about the Tesla catching fire.

Neither did.

Despite the long wait, I loved the Tesla charging experience. You just plugged it in. No apps, no credit cards, no instructions. The car and charger took care of everything.

I admired that simplicity.

In 2019, I traded my gasoline-powered Kia Soul for a 2019 Soul EV. That’s when I discovered what charging was like outside the Tesla ecosystem.

I needed different apps for different charging networks. Some required prepaid balances. Others needed a cellular connection to communicate with a server before they’d even deliver electricity. Sometimes the whole process failed.

It was ridiculous.

What surprised me most was that much of this charging infrastructure had come along after Tesla had already demonstrated how simple the experience could be. Technology that comes later should be better, shouldn’t it?

Tesla had set the bar. Yet major automakers and charging companies, including businesses with enormous financial and engineering resources, had somehow managed to deliver a more complicated experience.

Instead of coordinating around a seamless charging experience, the industry had left consumers juggling apps, accounts, payment systems, and incompatible networks.

Companies like GM, Toyota, and Kia had vastly greater resources than Tesla did in its early years. Surely they could have worked together to make charging as simple as plugging in a car.

But apparently, that was too much to ask.

Then I noticed something interesting in the underground parking garage of my condo building. There was an ordinary electrical outlet right beside my parking stall.

I started plugging into it. I hadn’t asked permission, but there was no rule against it, and the building already provided a shared Level 2 charging station as an amenity. By charging at my own stall, I was leaving that station available for the other EV owners.

And that’s when I made a discovery that changed how I thought about electric vehicles.

Level 1 charging was amazingly effective.

Most days, my car sat parked for hours. I didn’t need to charge quickly. I just needed to replace the electricity I’d used driving around town. An ordinary outlet could easily handle most of my daily driving. You can find out whether that’s true for your own driving with our EV Home Charger Calculator.

Better still, the experience was exactly what I’d loved about Tesla.

Plug in. Walk away.

No app. No network. No complicated electronics negotiating with servers somewhere on the internet.

I began wondering why condo and apartment buildings were spending thousands of dollars on sophisticated charging equipment when ordinary outlets or inexpensive Level 2 stations could do much of the job.

The electricity was already there. The charging technology was already inside the car.

What was missing was a simple way to track who used how much electricity and what they owed.

Of course, that would require some trust. Drivers would need to check in and out honestly. But in a condo or apartment building, where residents already have an established relationship and a contract with the property, that seemed perfectly reasonable.

And if there was no internet connection in the garage? Who cares? Plug in, charge your car, and record or adjust the session later.

I couldn’t stop thinking about it.

Eventually, I decided to build the software myself.

I called it EVnSteven.

A simple way for people to share existing electrical infrastructure, track charging time, and pay their fair share without expensive hardware or unnecessary complexity.

Looking back, I find it amusing that the whole journey began with a gasoline smell in the Arizona desert.

But the real revelation came much later, in an underground parking garage, when I discovered how much technology we didn’t actually need.

David Williston
Founder, EVnSteven.app

Your building is ready for EV charging.

Charge EVs at the outlets you already have. Drivers pay for the time they use.

Get EVnSteven

Subscribe to EVnSteven Notes

We use your email only to send these notes. Unsubscribe from any email. Privacy policy

Support & Guides

October 21, 2026

The Cost of Distrust

Imagine spending $10,000 on equipment to prevent someone from stealing $10 worth of electricity. Trust people first, make honesty easy, and don't punish a whole community because someone might cheat. 1 min read


October 29, 2026

EV Charging. Just 12 Cents.

EVnSteven charges 12 cents of software fee per charging session. Why we priced our software for a future where AI makes great software dramatically cheaper. 4 min read


October 26, 2026

The Infrastructure of Distrust

Paying $0.32 per kWh for electricity that costs $0.08 is a 300% markup. When I deleted the meters, networks and enforcement from EV charging, I found that much of the complexity exists because we assume people can't be trusted. 3 min read